How 10 Weeks of Lydiard's 100 Mile Weeks Makes You Faster

In his original training book, Run to the Top, to start off a training year Lydiard advocates for an initial General, or Base, Conditioning phase of 10 weeks of 100 Mile/week of “Marathon Training” for all runners in event groups 800m and up.

I’ve often been critical of the far too common misinterpretation and incorrect application of Lydiard’s 100 mile/week Marathon Training base phase. Some have mistaken that critique as a criticism of Lydiard's approach to base conditioning — which is not the case.

Lydiard is a coaching genius because, either implicitly or explicitly, he understood and got correct the critical importance of developing a runner’s Running Economy as a key fundamental physiological variable that impacts distance running performance.

Where most go wrong applying Lydiard’s 100 mile/week Marathon Training is not the volume of running performed, but the paces run.

Few run these 100 miles fast enough.

Remember, Lydiard called these 100 mile weeks “Marathon Training.”

Why?

As well soon see, roughly 75-80 miles per week are run at Marathon Pace with the other 25-20 miles at half-marathon pace or faster.

In a Lydiard base phase, any running which happens at paces slower than a runner’s marathon pace does not count as training. It’s general exercise, not training — he’s very clear on that.

Here is Lydaird’s original daily training guide he offers for a fit, but fairly new competitive runner to total 100 Mile/week of Marathon Training in the base phase:

• Monday: 10 Miles @ 1/2 Effort — over hills

• Tuesday: 15 miles @ 1/4 Effort — on roads

• Wednesday: 12 miles fartlek

• Thursday: 18 miles @ 1/4 Effort

• Friday: 10 Miles @ 3/4 Effort — on flat roads

• Saturday: 20 - 30 Miles @ 1/4 Effort

• Sunday: 15 Miles @ 1/4 Effort

The key to understanding Lydiard’s base period of “Marathon Training” in understanding his effort prescriptions.

For the Marathon Training base period, all the efforts are based on the runner’s 10 Mile race pace — which is very close to 15K race pace, or most runner’s general Lactate Threshold.

Lydirard assumed that his example runner’s 10 Mile race pace was 6:00/mile. The corresponding paces and percentages of 10 mile race pace for the efforts would then be:

• 3/4 effort = 6:15/mile — 95% of 10 Mile Race Pace

• 1/2 effort = 6:30/mile — 90% of 10 Mile Race Pace (Half Maraton Pace)

• 1/4 effort = 7:00/mile — 85% of 10 Mile Race Pace (Marathon Pace)

In Run to the Top, Lydiard explicitly says his example runner’s marathon pace is 7:00/mile, which the reader can see is the pace for 1/4 Effort. We can also establish that 90% of 10 M.R.P. is Half-Marathon pace.

Now let’s reexamine Lydiard’s daily training guide of 100 Mile/week of Marathon Training as duration and race paces:

• Monday: 1 hr 6 mins @ Half Marathon Pace — over hills

• Tuesday: 1 hr 45 mins @ Marathon Pace — on roads

• Wednesday: ~1 hr 15 mins at varying paces

• Thursday: 2 hrs 6 mins @ Marathon Pace

• Friday: 1 hr 2.5 mins @ 95% of 10 Mile Pace — on flat roads

• Saturday: 2 hr 20 mins - 3 hr 30 mins @ Marathon Pace

• Sunday: 1 hr 45 mins @ Marathon Pace

Here’s a pie chart visually expressing the total time spent training at each pace each week:

And the breakdown of the Total Time and Percent of Total Time spent at each pace per week:

@ Marathon Pace (1/4 effort):

• 8 to 9 hours — 77%

@ Half Marathon Pace (1/2 effort):

• 1 hour — 10%

@ 95% of 10 Mile Race Pace or faster (3/4 effort & Fartlek):

• 1.5 hours — 13%

As you can see Lydiard was very specific about what pace mattered most in base training — Marathon Pace.

Marathon Pace running is a physiological sweet spot for runners which advances several key performance variables, but most significantly running economy.

And 75-80 miles per week of Marathon Pace running is a very strong stimulus. Over 10 weeks, 750-800 miles of Marathon Pace will result in significant structural and physiological changes that will catapult a runner’s economy to new levels.

And these types of gains are very stable.

Meaning, they will last for months provided there is a consistent, light training load applied regularly — like a 2 hour long run once per week.

By enhancing his runner’s economy in such a significant way, Lydiard’s runners could sustain and benefit from the subsequent periods of high-intensity training in the Hill and Sharpening Phases of Lydiard’s training year.

Enhanced running economy was the foundation of Lydiard’s training approach. Which 100% agrees with today’s science and understanding of how to best train runners to become faster.

But remember, running economy doesn’t improve by just running more miles, it improves by running more “quality” miles, which in Lydiard’s case meant Marathon Pace miles.

Highlights on Block Periodization

Experts from the New Horizons for the Methodology and Physiology of Training Periodization paper by Vladimir B. Issurin.

As one of the most practically oriented components of theory, training periodization is intended to offer coaches basic guidelines for structuring and planning training.

However, during recent decades contradictions between the traditional model of periodization and the demands of high-performance sport practice have inevitably developed.

The main limitations of traditional periodization stemmed from:

1. conflicting physiological responses produced by ‘mixed’ training directed at many athletic abilities

2. excessive fatigue elicited by prolonged periods of multi-targeted training

3. insufficient training stimulation induced by workloads of medium and low concentration typical of ‘mixed’ training

4. the inability to provide multi-peak performances over the season

Its general idea proposes the sequencing of specialized training cycles, i.e. blocks, which contain highly concentrated workloads directed to a minimal number of targeted abilities.

Unlike traditional periodization, in which the mixed training program is intended to develop many abilities, the consecutive development of targeted abilities typical of block periodization produces training stimuli for several functions, while the other abilities decrease.

In this view, the duration of residual training effects becomes of primary importance. The correct sequencing of the mesocycles within the training stage makes it possible to obtain ‘‘optimal superposition of residual training effects’’, so as to allow competitive performance at a high level for all motor and technical abilities.

This possibility arises because the training residuals of basic abilities last much longer than the residuals of more specific abilities, while the residuals of maximal speed and event-specific readiness are the shortest. Thus, the total length of a single training stage ranges from 5 to 10 weeks, depending on competition frequency and sport-specific factors.

The residual training effect concept is relatively new and is less known than other types of training outcomes. Long-lasting training is intended to develop many motor abilities, which remain at a heightened level for a given period after training cessation. This retention belongs to another special type of training effect called the ‘residual training effect’, which can be characterized as ‘‘the retention of changes induced by systematic workloads beyond a certain time period after the cessation of training.’’[37] The general approach to ‘training residuals’ induced by ‘residual effects of training’ was conceptualized initially by Brian and James Counsilman,[88] and focused mainly on the longterm aspects of biological adaptation

You can download a pdf of this paper for free here.

I highly recommend Issurin’s books Block Periodization: Breakthrough in Sports Training and Block Periodization 2: Fundamental Concepts and Training Design for anyone interested in learning more about Block Periodization.